What are the pros and cons of stenting for cerebral infarction

After a disease like cerebral infarction occurs, it is still very difficult to deal with. After all, it will cause various complications. The best way is definitely surgical treatment, such as stenting. This is a treatment method that many patients will adopt. However, you cannot recover immediately after the stent is placed. You still need to go through a certain period of rehabilitation treatment. This is very critical and can determine whether the patient will have complications in the future. However, not every patient can undergo this stent surgery. They still need to do relevant physical examinations first and wait until it is confirmed that they can do it before undergoing treatment. Moreover, they must weigh the pros and cons before adopting this treatment method.

Is the bracket good?

The use of stents depends on the situation. Not all patients can undergo stenting. There is no need for angiography for cerebral infarction. Sleep well, eat a light diet, and exercise appropriately. If patients with movement disorders do not move for a long time, their joints will contract, so functional exercises are necessary. If the patient cannot move by himself, his family must help him move, just like a machine will rust if it does not run for a long time. The most important thing is the joints, and they must walk, stand, and go up and down stairs with support. Be cheerful and pay attention to controlling your blood pressure. If your blood pressure is high, you can take antihypertensive drugs.

Mesenchymal stem cells can indeed repair damaged tissues in the body and are now widely used, such as in the treatment of myocardial infarction, diabetes, and cerebral palsy in children. Most of them are cultured from autologous stem cells, but they can also be cultured using stem cells from other sources. However, there are no reports of them having a therapeutic effect on hypertension.

Cerebral infarction is the necrosis of brain tissue caused by blockage of cerebral blood vessels, with abnormal movement, sensation and other functions of the limbs, which are related to the location and size of the infarction. The treatment of cerebral infarction varies from person to person. In the acute phase, thrombolysis can be considered within 6 hours of onset. As for stents, cerebral angiography can be done first to clarify the location and degree of stenosis. As long as there are indications, stents can be implanted. 1. In addition to cerebral infarction caused by plaque detachment and vascular rupture and bleeding, there is also restenosis (the incidence is about 4% in 12 months). In addition, since anticoagulant drugs need to be taken for life after stent placement, the possibility of cerebral hemorrhage is increased. 2. The surgery is very mature. There is no risk of brain nerve damage, no general anesthesia is required, and recovery after surgery is quick. 3. Stent placement for the treatment of carotid atherosclerotic stenosis is a new technology that has emerged in recent years. There is currently a lack of long-term follow-up results from large-scale cases, so it should be selected with caution. To put it simply, the short-term effect is good, but I don’t know about the long-term effect. 4. The service life of the stent is very long, and generally there is no need to consider removing it.