Which is better, liver cancer intervention or radiofrequency ablation? Symptomatic treatment is the best effect

Every disease will cause harm to the patient's body, and will also have a certain impact on the patient's life and work. Liver cancer is one of many cancers, which makes the patient's body very uncomfortable. There are many treatment methods, and patients can choose the appropriate method according to their condition. Only symptomatic treatment can achieve good results.

For patients who need liver transplant for liver cancer, we cannot just watch the tumor develop while they are waiting for a liver source for half a year or several months. Radiofrequency ablation should be the first choice for early treatment of the tumor. Foreign research reports have also proved this point, that is, all 30 patients who received radiofrequency ablation before liver transplant for liver cancer received liver transplant six months later. Which is better for liver cancer intervention or radiofrequency ablation?

At this time, the lesions were well controlled. The other 30 patients did not receive radiofrequency ablation treatment. Half of them lost the opportunity for liver transplantation due to tumor progression after half a year, and only 50% of them received liver transplantation. Therefore, it is very meaningful to perform radiofrequency ablation treatment while waiting for a liver source.

The third indication is for liver metastasis lesions. For these isolated metastases, such as colorectal cancer metastasis, lung cancer metastasis, and breast cancer metastasis, as long as they are smaller than 5 centimeters, radiofrequency ablation can still be performed.

After surgery, you should keep all the catheters you wear unobstructed to prevent them from folding, getting blocked or falling off. Your body's resistance is relatively low after surgery, so you should keep warm and prevent colds.